Match every invoice to the PO and receipt behind it.
Agents match every invoice to its purchase order and goods receipt, checking price, quantity, and terms, and route what does not match with the exact discrepancy identified.
- 10-20%
- of invoices fail three-way match on a typical AP desk
- <1 min
- to identify the exact price, quantity, or terms mismatch
- 100%
- of invoices matched against PO and receipt, not a sample
01 Where value leaks
Exceptions pile up because nobody has time to identify what broke.
Three-way matching flags a mismatch but rarely explains it. Someone still has to trace the price, quantity, or terms difference by hand, so exceptions queue up instead of clearing.
-
Price mismatches between invoice, purchase order, and contract
-
Missing or incomplete purchase orders and receipts
-
Terms and tax differences that exact-match rules do not catch
-
Quantity and unit-of-measure differences between invoice and receipt
02 Audit first
Find the leak before changing the process.
The audit investigates the full scoped population against source evidence. Findings arrive quantified, recoverable, and ready for your team to act on.
What agents then prevent
Once the audit has found the leak, the same agents check every new transaction, so it stays closed.
Three-way matching with the specific mismatch identified automatically
Exception routing to the person who can resolve it, not a shared queue
Missing PO and receipt follow-up before the invoice ages
Match-rate tracking by vendor to target root causes
03 Proof
Matching every invoice changes what exceptions get explained.
- $50K
- duplicate invoice surfaced
- A US craft brewery · Cloudsquid customer result
- $730K
- in errors surfaced
- A construction wholesaler · 90% less manual reconciliation · Cloudsquid customer result
- < 2 hours
- to audit a full year of AP
- 100% transaction coverage · Cloudsquid customer result
04 Use cases