Two sides of the same dollar
Duvo catches leakage from inside the retailer’s operation. cloudsquid is built for the supplier/brand side - recovering what a retailer’s deductions, chargebacks, or short-pays already took.
Duvo is philosophically the closest thing to cloudsquid in the market - an agentic operations platform built by operators, not a “leakage recovery” vendor. The difference is scope: Duvo is built for retail/FMCG operators, cloudsquid for the finance teams of the physical-goods businesses selling into them.
01 Why cloudsquid
Duvo catches leakage from inside the retailer’s operation. cloudsquid is built for the supplier/brand side - recovering what a retailer’s deductions, chargebacks, or short-pays already took.
Duvo’s thesis that recovery should be a byproduct of operational control, not a standalone product, is one cloudsquid shares. The two platforms aren’t solving the same team’s problem, so they’re rarely a head-to-head buying decision.
02 Feature by feature
Based on publicly available information about Duvo; see the note at the bottom of this page.
| Capability | cloudsquid | Duvo |
|---|---|---|
| Built for the supplier/brand side of the transaction | Yes | No |
| Built for the retailer/operator side of the transaction | No | Yes |
03 A fair look
Built by the founders of Rohlik Group, a €1B+ grocery unicorn, with production proof from their own operation
Rohlik results: €2.1M revenue plus €1.4M margin protected per year from invoice reconciliation, €1M in phantom-inbound caught, promo margin lifted from 17% to 27% (+€2.6M/year), €180K per quarter in funding/mispricing leakage avoided, and €240K per year from catching bonus drift
Agents that read documents, match records, place phone calls to suppliers, and write back to ERPs
A “Clarity” module that maps how a process actually works before automating it
Built and proven from the retailer/operator side of the transaction - catching leakage internally at the retailer
Not positioned or built for the supplier/brand side of the same transactions
Production track record is EU-based (Rohlik Group is headquartered in the Czech Republic) - still building traction in the US market
04 Customers
“We’re on the front foot now. The team spends time on disputes, not data wrangling, and it’s showing up in significant cash back to the bottom line.”
“We tackled a massive document backlog of over 50,000 PDFs in minutes.”
05 Which to choose
You’re a retailer or FMCG operator looking to control leakage inside your own four walls.
You’re a supplier or brand recovering what’s been taken from your side of the transaction - deductions, chargebacks, freight overbilling, or trade spend disputes.
06 Questions
Not directly comparable in most cases - Duvo is built for retailers and FMCG operators controlling leakage inside their own operation. cloudsquid is built for the supplier/brand side, recovering what a retailer already took. Most teams only ever need one, depending on which side of the transaction they sit on.
It’s possible in principle - a retailer using Duvo internally could still face suppliers using cloudsquid to recover deductions from that same retailer. The two platforms serve different parties in the same transaction, not the same buyer.
Most engagements start with a bounded process and are live within two weeks, beginning with a read-only lookback audit against your own data.
cloudsquid is ISO 27001:2022 certified, with EU data residency available and a full audit trail on every finding.
Duvo figures as publicly reported by Duvo (Rohlik Group production results). Reflects publicly available information as of August 2026 - verify current details directly with Duvo.
07 Next step
A read-only lookback audit gives you findings and evidence from your own transactions before you decide anything.