Cotiviti built deep recovery-audit expertise across AP, AR, and freight, anchored in healthcare and public-sector contracts, with a contingency model built for Fortune 500 scale. cloudsquid runs the same document-first rigor continuously, extends it to revenue/pricing, and reaches the mid-market teams contingency economics leave behind.
01 Why cloudsquid
Cotiviti’s contingency audits surface historical errors on an annual or quarterly cadence. cloudsquid runs as a continuous control, catching new exceptions in real time instead of waiting for the next audit cycle.
Cotiviti’s contingency model only pencils out at large enterprise spend, where the average recovery dollar justifies the percentage fee. cloudsquid is platform-first and self-serve, so mid-market teams below that threshold get the same document-level scrutiny.
Cotiviti works largely from ERP data. cloudsquid also reads PDFs, emails, and vendor portals, so exceptions living outside structured data don’t get missed.
02 Feature by feature
Based on publicly available information about Cotiviti; see the note at the bottom of this page.
| Capability | cloudsquid | Cotiviti |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-domain coverage (AP + AR + Freight) | Yes | Yes |
| Revenue / pricing controls | Yes | No |
| Continuous, real-time monitoring (vs. annual/quarterly findings) | Yes | No |
| Self-serve, SOP-driven configuration (not a services engagement) | Yes | No |
| Accessible without a large-enterprise spend minimum | Yes | No |
| Reads source documents beyond the ERP (PDFs, emails, portals) | Yes | No |
03 A fair look
Decades of recovery-audit track record across AP, AR, and freight, at Fortune 500 scale
Deep healthcare and public-sector focus, with long-standing enterprise client relationships
Contingency model means clients pay only out of dollars actually recovered
Services-only model - a multi-month engagement, not a self-serve platform
Contingency economics require large enterprise spend, leaving mid-market underserved
Recovery-focused and historical - findings surface annually or quarterly, not continuously
Works largely from ERP data rather than source documents like PDFs, emails, and portals
04 Customers
“We’re on the front foot now. The team spends time on disputes, not data wrangling, and it’s showing up in significant cash back to the bottom line.”
“We tackled a massive document backlog of over 50,000 PDFs in minutes.”
05 Which to choose
You’re a large enterprise with big historical exception dollars and want a contingency-based recovery partner with a decades-long track record.
You want continuous prevention instead of an annual audit, or your spend doesn’t clear the threshold where contingency economics work.
06 Questions
Choose cloudsquid if you want continuous, self-serve coverage across AP, AR, freight, and revenue rather than a periodic contingency engagement, or if your spend is below the scale Cotiviti’s model targets.
No. Cotiviti’s recovery audits find historical errors on an annual or quarterly cadence; cloudsquid prevents new ones continuously. Many teams run both, on different time horizons.
Most engagements start with a bounded process and are live within two weeks, beginning with a read-only lookback audit against your own data.
cloudsquid is ISO 27001:2022 certified, with EU data residency available and a full audit trail on every finding.
Yes - the lookback audit reviews your full scoped transaction population against source documents before any continuous controls are put in place.
Cotiviti figures reflect Cotiviti’s publicly described recovery-audit positioning and contingency-based business model. Reflects publicly available information as of August 2026 - verify current details directly with Cotiviti.
07 Next step
A read-only lookback audit gives you findings and evidence from your own transactions before you decide anything.